MEVALAL AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN . SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS
WRIC/8466/2025 · 2025-09-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161262 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8466 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned State Counsel. Shri Dileep Kumar Pandey, learned counsel representing respondent no. 5 has also been heard.
2. It has been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners were allotted a lease for agricultural purposes in respect of certain area of Gata No. 369/0.304 hectares, situate in Village – Musaila H/o Taraf Mandai, Nagar Palika – Sandila, Pargana and Tehsil – Sandila, District - Hardoi in the year 2013 duly approved by Settlement Officer (Consolidation) on 20.04.2018, and on that basis his name has also been recorded in the khatauni pertaining to 1428-1433 F which has been annexed as annexure nos. 5 and 6 to the writ petition, however, he has not been delivered the possession thereof. It has further been stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been making the application to the Sub Divisional Officer concerned for giving the possession, but nothing has been done by the authorities concerned on the said application.
3. Having regard to the overall facts and circumstances of the case as observed above, this petition is finally disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to approach the Sub Divisional Officer/Assistant Collector concerned by moving a fresh application under Section 129 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and in case any such application is made, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law in view of the aforesaid observations, within a maximum period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and possession of the land being claimed by the petitioners shall also be handed over to them, if they are found to be a valid lessee and there is no legal impediment. September 4, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tushar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Mevalal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin . Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench