GAURAV SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/8087/2025 · 2025-09-08
Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161261 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8087 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Heard Sri Anuj Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGA. This petition has been filed with the following prayers:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the criminal history of the petitioner opened at history number 204A at Police Station Kotwali Ayodhya, District Ayodhya after summoning the same from original if required as the same was opened without following the rules of Uttar Pradesh Police Regulation. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the police authorities of District Ayodhya not to continue the surveillance of the petitioner and further not to interfere in the peaceful living of the petitioner on the basis of the history sheet No.204-A opened against him at Police Station Kotwali Ayodhya, District Ayodhya." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not a habitual offender and only one case bearing Case Crime No.429/2017 under Section 307, 506 IPC at Police Station Cantt. District Faizabad(now Ayodhya) is registered against the petitioner. Further he came to know that history sheet of the petitioner has been opened and he is under surveillance, therefore,the petitioner has approached to the Senior Superintendent of Police Ayodhya by means of the representation dated Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anuj Pandey, Anand Kumar Yadav, Shruti Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Gaurav Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
26.05.2025 contained in Annexure No.5 to the petition but no decision has been taken thereon till date. Therefore he makes an innocuous prayer for a direction for disposal of the said representation within some short stipulated period. To which there is no objection by learned AGA. In view of above, without entering into the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with direction to the respondent no.3/Senior Superintendent of Police, Ayodhya to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 26.05.2025, expeditiously, say within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and communicate the order to the petitioner forthwith. Consequences shall follow accordingly as per law.
September 8, 2025 Akanksha Sri/- CRLP No. 8087 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench