Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16126 (ALL)

RAJ BALA SPRING DALE ACADEMY BULANDSHAHAR AND ANOTHER v. PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY/S.D.M. SIKANDRABAD AND 2 OTHERS

WRIC/62303/2017 · 2025-02-12

Saral Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:21070 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 62303 of 2017 Petitioner :- Raj Bala Spring Dale Academy Bulandshahar And Another Respondent :- Prescribed Authority/S.D.M. Sikandrabad And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amit Saxena (Senior Adv.),Anshul Kumar Singhal,Nagesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dushyant Singh,M.C. Singh Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J. 1. It appears that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous, therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. 2. However, if the writ petition still survives, the learned counsel for the petitioners is at liberty to file recall application within a period of two months. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 SS Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad