Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161239 (ALL)

AMIT KUMAR RAJVANSHI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. GOVT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/8143/2025 · 2025-09-02

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8143 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Heard Sri Gauri Suwan Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing at some length, submits that he does not want to press this petition due to incurable defects, therefore, the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh with proper pleadings and prayers, to which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A. In view of above, the present writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. September 2, 2025 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gauri Suwan Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Amit Kumar Rajvanshi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench