1 2025:CGHC:32517-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MA No. 36 of 2024 1 - Shoma Bhattacharya (Incorrectly Referred To As Mrs. Soma Bhatacharya In The Writ Petition), D/o Shri S.R. Bhattacharya, Aged About 53 Years, Director, C.L. Chouksey Memorial Homoeopathic Memorial Homoeopathic Medical College, Hospital And Research Centre, Hospital And Research Centre, Lal Khadan, Masturi Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 1) 2 - Ashish Jaiswal, S/o Shri Krishna Kumar Jaiswal, Aged About 40 Years Managing Director, C.L. Chouksey Memorial Homoeopathic Medical College, Hospital And Research Centre, Lal Khadan, Masturi Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 3) ... Appellants versus 1 - Dr. Seema Jaiswal W/o Shri Shesh Jaiswal, Aged About 56 Years Senior Medical Officer, R/o Opposite Primary School Brij Vihar Colony, Mangla, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. (Petitioner) 2 - Dr. Satyajeet Thakur, C.L. Chouksey Memorial Homoeopathic Medical College, Hospital And Research Cellege, Lal Khadan, Masturi Road, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh (Respondent No. 2) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.07.14 17:48:54 +0530 2 3 - Dr. Sanjay Singh, Principal C.L. Chouksey Memorial Homoeopathic Medical College, Hospital And Research Centre, Lal Khadan, Masturi Road, Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. (Respondent No. 4) ... Respondents (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Amrito Das, Advocate with Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : Shri Neeraj Choubey, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 14.07.2025 1. Heard Shri Amrito Das, with Shri Mayank Chandrakar, learned counsels for the appellants. Also heard Shri Neeraj Choubey, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. 2. The present appeal has been filed with the following prayer:- “ It is, therefore, respectfully prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant appeal, set aside the impugned order dated 14.03.2024 passed by the Hon’ble Single Judge in Contempt Case (C) No. 653/2019 and also set aside/quash the charges framed against the appellants in furtherance of order dated 14.03.2024 in the interest of justice.” 3 3. At very outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the husband of the respondent No. 1 has died on account of which she has tendered resignation to the college showing her inability to continue with the job and She has further prayed that her retiral benefits which may approve to her be released. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant Shri Amrito Das states that he has no objection if the matter is disposed of. 5. Accordingly the impugned order dated 14.03.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in Contempt Case (C) No. 653/2019 and the charges framed against the appellants in furtherance of order dated 14.03.2024 is hereby dropped and this appeal is disposed of with a hope and trust that college would release the admissible retiral dues of the respondent, accordance with the rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Amardeep/Shoaib