PARVEZ AHMAD AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/7250/2025 · 2025-09-01
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161222 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7250 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Mr. Faraz Ahmad, Advocate has put in appearance by filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and perused the record. 3. Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the following prayer:-
"For the facts, reasons and circumstances as stated in the accompanying affidavit it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the chargesheet, cognizance and summoning order as well as entire proceeding of Criminal Case No. 14645/2023 titled as "State... Versus... Parvez and others" arising out of Case Crime No. 389/2023 Under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act at Police Station Kotwali Rudauli, District Ayodhya pending before the court of Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ayodhya in the light of compromise dated 29.07.2023 entered into by petitioners and opposite party No.2 which was duly verified by the Learned Trial Court on 19.08.2025."
4. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that due to certain misunderstanding, the instant FIR was lodged against the applicants and thereafter the parties sat together and has amicably settled their dispute which has been reduced in writing on 29.07.2025. He added that thereafter the applicants filed the instant application for direction to the trial Court to verify the compromise deed and in compliance of the order dated 06.08.2025, the verification was done and report has been submitted to this Court vide order dated 19.08.2025. He submits that further criminal proceeding in the instant matter would amount to harassment and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sayyed Farooq Ahmad, Afzal Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Faraz Ahmad Parvez Ahmad And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
thus the instant criminal proceeding arising out of F.I.R./ Case Crime No. 389 of 2023 may be quashed. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 has also supported the contention of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that parties have amicable settled their dispute and the opposite party no.
2 has no grievance, hence, criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped. 6. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the contention aforesaid. 7. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I find that compromise has been entered into between the parties on 29.07.2025 and said compromise has been verified on 19.08.2025 and, now, as per the statement of learned counsel for the parties, they do not want to press the aforementioned criminal case relating to F.I.R./ Case Crime No.389 of 2023. 8. In view of the above, as the applicants and opposite parties have entered into compromise on 29.07.2025 and no grievance remains to be agitated and as such, further criminal proceedings in the aforementioned criminal case are liable to be set aside in view of the Judgements of the Apex Court rendered in B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another (2003)4 SCC 675; Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation[2008)9 SCC 677]; Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303; and Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab ( 2014) 6 SCC 466 . 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Case No. 14645 of 2023 titled as "State... Versus... Parvez and others" arising out of Case Crime No. 389 of 2023, under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C. & 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali Rudauli, District Ayodhya, is hereby quashed. 10. The compromise shall be part of this order. 11. The application is allowed accordingly. 12. Consigned to record. September 1, 2025 Mohd. Sharif A482 No. 7250 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench