Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161210 (ALL)

BALIRAM v. VAISHALI AHLAWAT TEHSILDAR OFFICER TEHSIL FATEHPUR DISTT. BARABANKI

CAPL/3841/2024 · 2025-03-04

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13251 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 3841 of 2024 Applicant :- Baliram Opposite Party :- Vaishali Ahlawat Tehsildar Officer Tehsil Fatehpur Distt. Barabanki Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjeev Kumar Shukla Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. 1. Case has been called in the revised list.. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant is neither present nor any request for the adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf. 3. The present contempt application has been preferred against the alleged non-compliance of the interim dated 19.03.2024, passed by the writ court in Writ C No. 2633 of 2024. The relevant extract of the same is quoted hereinbelow:- "3. Taking note of the facts as stated as also the period of pendency of application in issue, this petition is disposed of with direction to opposite party no.4- Tehsildar, Tehsil, Fatehpur- District- Barabanki to consider and decide the pending application, quoted in the prayer clause, most expeditiously, after affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, including Village Panchayat concerned and State of U.P., without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, preferably within a period of three months from the production of certified copy of this order, if there is no other legal impediment in this regard. 4. It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either party on merits and the Authority concerned shall be free to decide the matter strictly in accordance with law." 4. On the other hand, learned State counsel, on the basis of the compliance affidavit filed by the respondent on 13.11.2024 has submitted that the representation of the applicant as well as the proceedings under Section 76(1) has been decided by order dated 05.11.2024 (annexed as Annexure No. 1). 5. It is further submitted that till date, no objection has been filed against the compliance affidavit. 6. After the perusal of the records, it is found that the judgment and order dated 19.03.2024, passed by the writ court in Writ C No. 2633 of 2024 has been complied with. 7. In view of the above, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. 8. Notice, if any, stands discharged. Order Date :- 4.3.2025/DiVYa Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench