NABAB ALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRATAPGARH AND OTHERS
A227/5270/2025 · 2025-09-04
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161183 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161183 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5270 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Shri Jaipal Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, Shri Pankaj Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent no.3- Gaon Sabha and Shri Amar Nath Dubey, learned counsel for the respondent no.4.
2. The present petition has been filed assailing the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by Sub Divisional Officer, Tehsil Sadar, District Pratapgarh in exercise of power under Section 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code.
3. Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the petitioner has equally efficacious remedy to file an appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code.
4. At this stage petitioner's counsel does not dispute the objections raised by learned counsel for the respondents and submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file an appeal under Section 24(4) of the U.P. Revenue Code.
5. In the light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 4, 2025 Muk Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jai Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Amar Nath Dubey, Pankaj Gupta (Alok Mathur,J.) Nabab Ali .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Pratapgarh And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench