Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16117 (HP)

KAURI DEVI v. STATE OF HP AND ORS

EX.P./833/2024 · 2025-04-02

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.833 of 2024 Decided on: 2nd April, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Kauri Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sandeep K. Pandey, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 3. Mr. Rangil Singh, Advocate, for respondent No.4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Following order was passed in the matter on 08.01.2025:- “Learned Deputy Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 07.01.2025 from the Executive Engineer, Chopal Division, HPPWD, stating therein that meeting of Council of Ministers has not taken place and that the matter will be placed in the next Cabinet meeting. In view of above instructions, list after six weeks.” 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 03.03.2025 from the Executive Engineer, HPPWD Division Chopal, conveying 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 that necessary relaxation of medical examination has been accorded by the Engineer-in-Chief, HPPWD on 21.01.2025, therefore, family pension case of the petitioner has been re-submitted to the Principal Accountant General (A&E), Himachal Pradesh on 05.02.2025. Copy of office letter dated 05.02.2025 has also been appended alongwith the instructions memo. 3. Learned counsel for respondent No.4 submits that necessary action on the aforesaid office letter concerning family pension to be paid to the petitioner will be taken within two weeks. Taking note of the above submissions and documents, the present execution petition is disposed of at this stage with liberty reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law for the redressal of her surviving grievances, if any, at an appropriate stage, in case necessity so arises. Jyotsna Rewal Dua April 02, 2025 Judge Mukesh