Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16116 (RAJ)

BHUPENDRA SINGH CHAUDHARY AND ORS v. REGISTRAR RAJASTHAN PARAMEDICAL AND ANR

CW/4952/2018 · 2025-02-13

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:6382] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4952/2018 1. Bhupendra Singh Chaudhary S/o Shri Teekam Singh Jat, aged about 24 years, R/o Akodiya Patti, Wazirpur, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawaimadhopur 2. Ramakant Verma S/o Shri Anil Kumar Verma, R/o Nandrampura, P.o. Mandrella, Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu 3. Mukesh Patidar S/o Shri Bhorelal Ji Patidar, R/o Bisal Coas Kalan, Tehsil Neemach, District Neemach M.p. 4. Rahul Karsaliya S/o Shri Narendra Karsaliya, R/o Risoora, Via Shri Mahaveer Ji, Todabhim, District Karauli 5. Banwari Lal Saini S/o Shri Sanwarlal Saini, R/o Maurija, Maurija, Jaipur 6. Omprakash Jangid S/o Shri Dhannaram Jangid, R/o Ramnagar, Rawati Road, Soor Nagar, Jodhpur ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Registrar, Rajasthan Paramedical Council, House No. 06, Averest Colony, Lal Kothi, Jaipur, Rajasthan 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Examination Controller, University Of Health Science, Rajasthan, Jaipur. Norangram Dayanand Dhukiya Paramedical Sansthan Malsisar Road, Jhunjhunu (Raj.) Swasthya Kalyan Paramedical College, J.L. N. Marg, Jaipur Jindal Paramedical Institute, Mukharjee Nagar, Bharatpur Tagire Institute of Paramedical Science Mansarovar, Jaipur NIMS Paramedical College, N.H. 11, Delhi Highway, Shobha Nagar, Jaipur Maharana Pratap Institute of Paramedical Sciences and Technology, Chhitorgarh (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None Present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ankit Sethi and Mr. Rupendra Singh Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order [2025:RJ-JP:6382] (2 of 2) [CW-4952/2018] 13/02/2025 Learned counsel for the respondent-university submits that on account of subsequent development, this writ petition is rendered infructuous. None for the petitioners to rebut the aforesaid statement. In view thereof, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J DIKSHA /71