HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10038 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. 1. Heard. 2. Admittedly, the petitioners are employees of a service provider. 3. The claim of the petitioners for payment of overtime allowance, salary etc., has been rejected by the Chief Medical Officer, Shravasti by indicating the said fact. 4. Once the petitioners are the employees of the service provider as such no error is found in the order of the Chief Medical Officer, Shravasti who has rejected the representation of the petitioner. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of leaving it open to the petitioners to pursue any other remedy that may be available to them under law. September 2, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandeep Kumar Pandey, Shitla Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Abdul Moin,J.) Sudheer Anand Pathak And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical Health Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench