SMT. NEELAM TIWARI v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (JUDICIAL), LALGANJ, PRATAPGARH AND 2 OTHERS
A227/5173/2025 · 2025-09-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161139 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161139 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5173 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondents no.2 and 3 is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Lalganj, District Pratapgarh to decide the restoration application dated 10/14.10.2024, Case No.RST/7633/2024 (Computerized Case No.T-202402570207633), Neelam Tiwari vs. Gaon Sabha, under Section 143 of the UPZA&LR Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Lalganj, District Pratapgarh, considers and decides the aforesaid restoration application in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Lalganj, District Pratapgarh is directed to decide the restoration application dated 10/14.10.2024, Case No.RST/7633/2024 (Computerized Case No.T-202402570207633), Neelam Tiwari vs. Gaon Sabha, under Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Puttu Lal Misra, Prince Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Smt. Neelam Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Lalganj, Pratapgarh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
Section 143 of the UPZA&LR Act, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 KR A227 No. 5173 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench