Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161132 (ALL)

RAMESH KUMAR v. THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, SADAR, SULTANPUR AND OTHERS

A227/5171/2025 · 2025-09-01

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5171 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1. 2. In view of the proposed order, notice to private respondent no.2 is dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Sultanpur to decide the application of the petitioner dated 06.01.2022 (Computerized Case No.T-202204680601433) filed for recall of the ex parte order dated 29.12.2015 passed in Computerized Case No.T20140468068009, Ram Het vs. State of U.P., expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Sultanpur, considers and decides the aforesaid application in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Sultanpur is directed to decide the application of the petitioner dated 06.01.2022 (Computerized Case No.T-202204680601433) filed for recall of the ex parte order dated 29.12.2015 passed in Computerized Case Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Ramesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Sultanpur And Others .....Respondent(s) No.T20140468068009, Ram Het vs. State of U.P., expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 KR A227 No. 5171 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench