MANOJ MALIK ALIAS MANOJ KUMAR v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH SECRETARY HOME GOVT OF U.K. DEHRADUN
C482/182/2023 · 2025-03-28
Alok Mahra
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16112 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16112 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
C-482 No. 182 of 2023 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J.
Mr. Sachin Panwar, learned counsel for the applicant.
2. Mr. K.S. Bora, learned D.A.G. for the State.
3. The grounds shown in the Delay Condonation Application are sufficient to condone the delay. Delay Condonation Application (IA No. 3 of 2026) is allowed. The delay in filing the restoration application is hereby condoned.
4. The reasons given in the restoration application, according to this Court, are sufficient to allow the restoration application, therefore, the restoration application is allowed. The
order dated 28.03.2025 is recalled. The present C-482 application is
directed to be restored to its original number.
5. At this stage, learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant as well as respondent no. 2 have entered into a compromise and they are living together in their matrimonial house. Thus, considering this fact, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present criminal misc. application.
6. Permission is granted.
7. The present criminal misc. application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
( Alok Mah r a J.)
17.03.2026 Ujjwal