Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16112 (JHR)

RAJU DOM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4679/2025 · 2025-08-01

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. ( 2025:JHHC:21399 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4679 of 2025 ------ Raju Dom, aged about 43 years, S/o. Late Tuli Dom @ Late Tulsi Dom, R/o. Vill.- Chiru Tola- Patkhahi, P.O. & P.S.- Chhattarpur, Dist.- Palamau. … … Petitioner -Versus - The State of Jharkhand ... … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. No. 2, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, A.P.P. ------ 03/01.08.2025 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S. T. Case No. 247/2016 arising out of Chhattarpur P.S. Case No. 108/2011 corresponding to G. R. Case No. 1413/2011, for the offences registered under Sections 302/201/34 of the I.P.C., pending in the Court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II, Palamau at Daltonganj. 3. Bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. No. 9892/2024 by order dated 29.11.2024. 4. On 15.08.2011, the petitioner came to the house of the informant and took his brother alongwith him. Thereafter, his brother was found murdered. 5. It appears that deceased was having illicit relationship with the wife of the petitioner Raju Dom and as such suspicion has been raised upon him. 6. Report regarding the stage of trial earlier called for, has been received. It appears that trail is likely to be concluded within six months. 7. Considering the nature of allegation and trial is likely to be concluded soon, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail stands rejected once again. 8. Learned Trial Court shall expedite the trial and preferably conclude the same within six months from the next date of recording of evidence. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Rahul/-