Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:HHC:29076 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No. 615 of 2025 Decided on : 28.08.2025 Shri Kishori Lal. …Petitioner Versus Dr. Nipun Jindal, Managing Director, HRTC. …Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Mandeep Chandel, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Rahul Thakur, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Though compliance affidavit is under objection, but the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in terms of the contents thereof, respondent though have agreed that the petitioner is entitled for the relief, as has been granted by the Court, but they say that the same shall be released as and when decided by the BOD.
2. This Court is of the considered view that in the light of the fact that this Court has granted six weeks time in terms of judgment dated 02.04.2025, to comply the order, the 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2 2025:HHC:29076 compliance thereof cannot be at the whims of the respondent. Accordingly, in order to be fair to the respondent, six weeks time is granted to the needful.
3. With these observations, these proceedings are closed, but with liberty to the to seek revival thereof, in case, needful is not done within a period of six weeks from today and Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Notice discharged.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
August 28, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)