REENA GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. BAL VIKAS SEVA EVAM PUSHTAHAR VIBHAG LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9918/2025 · 2025-09-01
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161119 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161119 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9918 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority to provide appointment certificate to petitioner in pursuance of approval order of the authority concerned with regard to selection of petitioner on the post of Anganbari Worker.
3. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. District Program Officer (Child Development) Balrampur or any other competent authority. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. The petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Perdeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Reena Gupta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Seva Evam Pushtahar Vibhag Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench