NAVDEEP SINGH ALIAS NAWDEEP SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./4713/2025 · 2025-06-05
Deepak Roshan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16111 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16111 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:14728 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 4713 of 2025
--------- Navdeep Singh @ Nawdeep Singh, aged about 23 years, son of Awtar Singh, resident of Qtr. No.29, Banas Road, Tinplate, P.O. Golmuri, P.S. Golmuri, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P.
--------- 02/Dated:-05.06.2025
1.
Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2.
The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118, 103, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, however, cognizance has been taken under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109, 103, 3(5) of B.N.S. vide order dated 28.04.2025 in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case No.12 of 2025.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the Petitioner is languishing in custody since 02.02.2025. He further submits that due to some dispute with regard to the vehicle parking a sudden fight happened due to which the deceased sustained injury and during course of treatment he died. He further submits that the incident had occurred on a spur of moment and not premeditated as alleged by the informant and there is no direct or specific allegation against the petitioner and he has been falsely implicated in this case by the informant. He further submits that the petitioner is aged about 60 years and suffering from various old age ailment; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court.
2025:JHHC:14728 2
4.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5.
Having regard to the facts of the case and also looking to the allegation made against this petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Jamshedpur in connection with Golmuri P.S. Case No.12 of 2025.
6.
It is made clear that during trial the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial. Further, the petitioner will submit photocopy of his Aadhaar Card and mobile number before the court below which he will always keep active and will not change and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to take appropriate action.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-