Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161096 (ALL)

SYED MOHAMMAD JAKI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/9850/2025 · 2025-09-01

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9850 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for payment of post retiral benefits such as pension, gratuity and leave encashment with effect from the date of confirmation on 01.03.1991 alongwith interest. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the opposite party no.3 i.e. District Magistrate/Deputy Director of Consolidation, District Badaun who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. September 1, 2025 Satish Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : D.K. Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Syed Mohammad Jaki .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench