Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161092 (ALL)

SANJAY @ PINTU GHASEETE v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A482/7207/2025 · 2025-09-01

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 7207 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. Instant application under section 482 Cr.P.C./528 of the B.N.S.S., 2023, has been filed with the prayer to quash the order of Non Bailable Warrant issued in pursuance of the proceedings of the first information report No. 136 of 2018, under sections 279,337 & 338 of the I.P.C., Police Station-Bangarmau, District-Unnao. The instant matter pertains to the year 2018 and as per the contention of learned counsel for the applicant, the applicant was not aware with respect to institution of a criminal case against him and therefore, he could not appear before the learned trial court. He submits that the applicant undertakes that he will appear on each and every date fixed before the learned trial court and will never abscond. Learned counsel appearing for the State has opposed the contentions aforesaid. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, particularly, to meet out the ends of interest of justice and the undertaking given by the applicant that he will appear on each and every date fixed before the learned trial court, the effect and Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjeev Trivedi, Mohd. Shahid Chaudhary Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sanjay @ Pintu Ghaseete .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Chief Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) operation of the Non Bailable Warrant, is hereby kept in abeyance. It is directed that the applicant shall appear before the learned trial court on the next date fixed, failing which, learned trial court shall proceed in accordance with law. It is further provided that the applicant shall remain present on each and every date fixed before the learned trial court and he will not remain absent without the written application with a cogent reason given before the learned trial court. With the aforesaid observations, the instant application is disposed of. September 1, 2025 AKS A482 No. 7207 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench