Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161071 (ALL)

DHEERAJ BAHADUR SINGH YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8231/2025 · 2025-09-03

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8231 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Vivek Chandra, the learned counsel for the applicant, Smt. Kamlesh Kumari, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 346 of 2020, under Section 409, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 34 IPC, Police Station Kotwali Nagar, Barabanki. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 24.05.2020 against ten named persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant had made some investments in Vishwas Trading Company Pvt. Ltd. but upon maturity, no returns were paid. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case.The applicant's involvement in 32 other cases has been disclosed in para 16 of the affidavit, in 11 of which he has already been granted bail. 5. It has been stated in the affidavit that the applicant is neither a director nor any other position holder in the aforesaid company and in fact he had also made some investments in the company and he had been duped by the company. 6. The applicant has been implicated merely after recording in the case diary that he is also involved in commission of the offence without assigning any specific role of the applicant. 7. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dheeraj Bahadur Singh Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) 8. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and without making any observation, which may affect the merits of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid case. 9. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Dhiraj Bahadur Singh Yadav be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 3, 2025 -Amit K- BAIL No. 8231 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench