Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161066 (ALL)

CHAVINATH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIC/8458/2025 · 2025-09-08

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8458 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Ram Asarey Verma, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and Sri Dilip Pandey, learned counsel for respondent No. 3. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that he does not want to press the writ petition and seeks liberty to file an appeal against the impugned order. 3. Learned counsel for respondents have no objection to the aforesaid request. 4. In light of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 8, 2025 Ravi/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ram Asarey Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Alok Mathur,J.) Chavinath And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench