Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16105 (GAU)

BINITA MEDHI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

AB/1700/2025 · 2025-09-18

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010156512025 2025:GAU-AS:13038 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/1700/2025 BINITA MEDHI W/O MRIDUL MEDHI, PERMANENT RESIDENT OF VILL- NIZ KHATOWAL, P.O. SAMAGURI, P.S. KHATOWAL, DIST. NAGAON, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE LEARNED PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR SARFRAZ NAWAZ, A S CHOUDHURY,SAMIM RAHMAN,MS SURAYA RAHMAN,MR A W AMAN,MR. SURAJIT DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 19.09.2025 1. Heard Mr. S. Rahman, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 of the Page No.# 2/2 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, praying for grant of pre- arrest bail to the petitioner in connection with Khatowal P. S. Case No. 25/2025, under Sections 329(3)/296/118(2)/3(5) of BNS. 3. On 23.07.2025, the accused petitioner was granted interim bail, pursuant to which he is stated to have appeared before the I.O, as submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. The prosecution submits that, in the meantime, the investigation is completed resulting in the filing of a charge-sheet. 5. In the situation, the interim granted vide order dated 23.07.2025 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions : i) That the petitioner shall be available for trial ; ii) That the petitioner shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail petition stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant