HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9806 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3, 4 & 5. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having been regularized in February, 2005 and having retired on 31.07.2024, the respondents have failed to grant the benefit under the old pension scheme. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 and 2 and Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.3, 4 & 5 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Hanumant Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh Amar Nath Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Prin. Secy. Agriculture Education And Research Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. August 29, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 9806 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench