RAN VIJAY SINGH AND 8 OTHERS v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE,TAHSIL HAIDERGARH, DISTT. BARABANKI AND OTHERS
A227/5145/2025 · 2025-09-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161037 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161037 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5145 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent no.1.
2. In light of the proposed order, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Haidergarh, Barabanki, to decide the Case No.T202504120508685) Ran Vijay Singh and others vs. Gram Sabha and others, under Section 101 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that grievance of the petitioners would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Haidergarh, Barabanki, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to approach the court/ authority concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of the No.T202504120508685) Ran Vijay Singh and others vs. Gram Sabha and others, under Section 101 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Kumar Pandey, Saniya Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh, Uday Veer Singh Ran Vijay Singh And 8 Others .....Petitioner(s) Sub Divisional Magistrate,Tahsil Haidergarh, Distt. Barabanki And Others .....Respondent(s)
such an application is moved, the court/authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioners, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
7. With above observations, the writ petition is disposed of. September 1, 2025 KR A227 No. 5145 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench