Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2 L. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
2025:UHC:11555
WPCRL No.1760 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Piyush Sammal, learned counsel and Ms. Sarita Bisht, learned counsel for the Petitioners.
2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned AGA for the State.
3. By means of this writ petition, petitioners have challenged the First Information Report No.105 of 2025 dated 09.04.2025 under Sections 420 and 506 of IPC registered at Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital. Further prayer has been made directing the respondent no.2 not to arrest the petitioner pursuant to the aforesaid FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has limited his argument to the extent that the investigation agency should comply with the guidelines given in Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar and Another reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273.
5. Since the aforesaid offences carry a punishment maximum to seven years, therefore, before resorting to any arrest, prior notice under Section 35 (3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (under Section 41A of Cr.P.C.) is necessary to be issued to the Petitioners. Hence, it is provided that before taking any coercive measures against the Petitioner, the Investigating Officer shall abide by procedure given under Section 35(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (under Section 41A of Cr.P.C.).
6. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of.
7. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of accordingly.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
24.12.2025 Arti
ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.12.24 12:04:21 +05'30'