- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4584 RFA No. 296 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31ST DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 296 OF 2024 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. PRAMEELA D/O LATE DYAVANNA, W/O MUNISWAMI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT HOSAHALLI VILLAGE, HUNASAMARANAHALLI HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK-562 157. 2. SMT.MUNIRATHNA D/O LATE DYAVANNA, W/O GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RA/T DEVEGOWDA NAGARA, HESARAGHATTA, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI AND POST, BENGALURU NORTH-560 088. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. THYAGARAJ.M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O LATE DYAVANNA, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2. SRI BYRAPPA S/O LATE DYAVANNA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 3. SRI SURESHA S/O LATE DYAVANNA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4584 RFA No. 296 of 2024 4. SRI NAGARAJU S/O LATE DYAVANNA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 4 ARE R/AT DIBBUR VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA HOBLI AND POST, BENGALURU NORTH-560 089. 5. SMT.ANJINAMMA D/O LATE DYAVANNA, W/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT MAKKENAHALLI VILLAGE, TUBAGERE HOBLI, MELEKOTE POST, BENGALURU RURAL-561 205. 6. SMT.VIMALA D/O LATE DYAVANNA, W/O V.N.NAGARAJA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT PARVATHIPURA, ADGANAHALLI VILLAGE, HESARAGHATTA POST, RAJANUKUNTE POST, BENGALURU NORTH-560 064. 7. HANUMANTHAPPA S/O LATE THIMMARAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT DIBBUR VILLAGE, KAKOLU POST, HESARAGAHTTA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH-560 088. …RESPONDENTS THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLI RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 96 OF THE CPC, 1908. THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4584 RFA No. 296 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Sri.Thyagaraj.M., counsel for the appellants has appeared in person. Counsel for the appellants submits that a memo has been filed stating that the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the appellants submits that a conscious decision is taken by him and the appellants to withdraw the appeal and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the order and will not file the Review Petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the appellants and the memo is placed on record. The Regular First Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. The Registry concerned is hereby directed to return the documents by replacing the same with Xerox copies. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21