Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 161014 (ALL)

KULDEEP YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/8267/2025 · 2025-09-02

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8267 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Smt. Jyoti Rawat, Learned Counsel for the applicant, and Shri Amit Kumar Dwivedi, Learned Addl. Government Advocate, for the state. 2. The applicant has filed this application for his release on bail in case crime No. 0580/2023 under sections 452, 323, and 436 IPC at Police Station Kotwali Bikapur, District Ayodhya. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an FIR lodged on 9/11/2023 against three persons, including the applicant, stating that the accused persons entered the informant's house at about 8:30 PM on 8/11/2023 and assaulted his grandson and set her thatched-roof ablazed. 4. In the affidavit filed in support of the bail application, it has been stated that the applicant is a young man, aged 23 years, having no criminal history, and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It has also been stated in the affidavit that Co-accused Vansh Raj, against whom similar allegations have been leveled, has already been granted bail by means of an order dated 24/07/2024 passed by a coordinate bench of this court in bail application No. 470 of 2024, which has been annexed as Annexure No. 4 to the affidavit. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jyoti Rawat, Akanksha Suman, Ram Samujh Rawat Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Kuldeep Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) application and has submitted that the allegations have been established during investigation and the chargesheet has been submitted on 15 July 2025. 6. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that a co-accused has been granted bail; that the applicant is a young man having no previous criminal history, and that he is languishing in jail since 19/05/2025, whereas the investigation stands concluded, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let the applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, each in a like amount, to the satisfaction of the Magistrate/court concerned, subject to the following conditions: (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his appearance is exempted by the learned trial court. September 2, 2025 A.Nigam BAIL No. 8267 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench