RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. BASIC EDUCATION GOVT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/9909/2025 · 2025-09-01
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 161010 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9909 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to implead the U.P. State Election Commission through its Commission, Station Road, Lucknow, U.P. as respondent No.6 during the course of the day.
2. Prayer made is allowed.
3. Let respondent No.6 be impleaded during the course of the day.
4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vijay Vikram Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents No.1 to 3, Sri Prashant Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the respondents No.4 & 5 and Sri Akash Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.6.
5. There is consensus at the bar that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court passed in Writ-A No.9925 of 2025 in re: Dr. Sandeep Shukla and 3 others vs. State of U.P. and others, decided on
01.09.2025. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajendra Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Basic Education Govt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
6. Accordingly taking into consideration the aforesaid consensus, the present petition is disposed of in light of the aforesaid judgment passed in the case of Dr. Sandeep Shukla (supra).
7. It is provided that the petitioner would also be entitled for the benefit of the judgment of Dr. Sandeep Shukla (supra). September 1, 2025 cks/- WRIA No. 9909 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench