Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16101 (GAU)

SUNAM UDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/782/2025 · 2025-07-29

Anjan Moni Kalita, Michael Zothankhuma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010156312025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/782/2025 SUNAM UDDIN S/O. LT. SABIR ALI, VILL.- KALAMAGURA, P/S. RATABARI, DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A CHOUDHURY, MISS. P M AHMED,U U KHAN,MR. A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : ST.Rev./0/0 SUNAM UDDINASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAMREP BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR MASUM AZIZ CHOUDHURY Advocate for : appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 30.07.2025 (M. Zothankhuma, J) Heard Mr. M. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that Page No.# 2/2 there is a delay of 1065 days in preferring the connected appeal. Ms. A. Begum, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam has got no objection to the delay being condoned. On considering the submissions of the learned counsels for the parties, we find that sufficient cause for the delay has been made out. Accordingly, the delay is condoned. Registry to register the connected appeal and list the same after a week. I.A. is accordingly allowed and disposed off. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant