HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9953 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to authority concerned for deciding petitioner's application for appointment on the post of Anganwadi Worker in the Village concerned in terms of advertisement dated 17.12.2024. 3. Learned State Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 30.08.2025, a copy of which is taken on record and indicates that petitioner's online application form contained incorrect details due to which her candidature has not been considered. 4. Learned counsel for petitioner in rebuttal thereof submits that error indicated in the uploaded application form is very minute and would not make any difference with regard to criteria for selection. 5. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite parties 3 and 4 collectively. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from receipt of representation of petitioner along with a certified copy of this order. 6. With aforesaid direction, the petition stands finally disposed of. September 4, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Om Prakash Yadav, Ankur Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Shallu Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Bal Vikas Evam Pushtahar Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench