SADDEEK @ SADEEK S/O IBRAHEEM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5352/2025 · 2025-05-14
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16100 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 16100 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:20370] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5352/2025 Saddeek @ Sadeek S/o Ibraheem, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 13, Indrawas Mandana, District Kota, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bobby Dutta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Onkar Singh Rajpurohit, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 14/05/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0146/2024 registered at Police Station-Papada, District-Dausa for the offences under Sections 8, 18, 29 of the NDPS Act and later on converted Sections 8/18, 8/29 of the NDPS Act, Section 42 of the Prisons Act and Sections 319(2), 345(3), 303(2), 317(2), 238(c) and 61(2)(a) of the BNS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery was affected from open place. At that time, the petitioner was not present on the spot. Other co-accused- Surendra Singh and Ramnath have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. So called contraband is
[2025:RJ-JP:20370] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5352/2025] below the commercial quantity and there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The petitioner is behind the Bar since 19.10.2024. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Saddeek @ Sadeek S/o Ibraheem shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Anil Sharma/178