Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16099 (ALL)

NAUSHAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/1583/2025 · 2025-03-04

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31388 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 1583 of 2025 Petitioner :- Naushad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Arvind Kumar Goswami,C.S.C.,Shashi Kant Mishra,Siddharth Singhal Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the amounts claimed by the petitioner have been disbursed to him. Sri Arvind Kumar Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Sri Shashi Kant Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 4 affirm the aforesaid submission. Cause of action on which the writ petition was founded does not survive. The writ petition has become infructuous. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Mohini Digitally signed by :- MOHINI RAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad