Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16098 (JHR)

SIKANDAR KUMAR DAS ALIAS SIKANDAR DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4720/2025 · 2025-06-18

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:16126 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4720 of 2025 ------ Sikandar Kumar Das @ Sikandar Das, aged about 24 years, son of Sudhir Das, resident of Village –Upardih, Barguniya, P.O. Kasathi, P.S. –Devipur, District –Deoghar, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Shweta Singh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 18.06.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 338, 340(2) & 61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 66B, 66C, 66D & 84C of the Information Technology Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in commission of cybercrime and one mobile phone along with sim card has been recovered from the petitioner. There is further allegation that there is money trial of Rs.2,934/- but the name of the defrauded person is yet to be ascertained. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-14 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 24.03.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 16 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.3,000/- and furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime Case, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.49 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/