SHIV BAHADUR v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER JUDICIAL, AYODHYA DIVISION, AYODHYA AND OTHERS
A227/5166/2025 · 2025-09-01
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160970 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160970 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5166 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel tot the State respondent no.1.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are hereby dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No. 1 to decide the application for interim relief / stay application dated 19.06.2025 filed in Appeal No.1677 / 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202504000001677) "Ram Ganesh & others vs. Sunil Yadav and others", U/S 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to consider and decide the stay application filed along with aforesaid appeal.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Accordingly, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner, without entering into the merits, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent no. 1, Additional Commissioner (Judicial), Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya to consider and decide the application for interim relief / stay application dated 19.06.2025 filed in Appeal No.1677 / 2025 (Computerized Case No.T202504000001677) "Ram Ganesh & others vs. Sunil Yadav and Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Kumar Yadav, Poonam Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Shiv Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) Addl. Commissioner Judicial, Ayodhya Division, Ayodhya And Others .....Respondent(s)
others", U/S 38(4) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, within a period of six weeks from the date sufficiency of service is received with regard to the respondents and in case there is some legal impediment, it shall also be open for the petitioner to press for grant of ad interim relief in case the case is so made out. September 1, 2025 KR A227 No. 5166 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RABINDRA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench