HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9874 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties. 2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking following main relief:- "(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing opposite parties to grant all post-retiral dues to petitioner such as pension, commutation of pension, gratuity, leave encashment, group insurance scheme etc. along with arrears of pension with effect from date of superannuation, counting his past services rendered as work charge employee in work charge establishment prior to regularization of his services in the regular establishment with all consequential benefits. (ii) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing opposite parties to consider and decide representation submitted by petitioner purporting to counting of his past services rendered as work-charge employee for pension and other post-retiral benefits." 3. It is submitted that petitioner has superannuated from service in year 2024 from department concerned after regularization of service but his service rendered earlier as work-charge employee has not been taken into account. 4. For redressal of grievance, petitioner has already submitted representation(s) but seek liberty to file a fresh representation before authority concerned. 5. Learned counsel for petitioner restricts prayer for decision on representation of petitioner. 6. Considering the innocuous prayer, without adverting to merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to make fresh representation before opposite party no.2, i.e. Director and Chief Engineer, Rural Engineering Department, U.P. Lucknow. In case Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shambhoo Sharan Lal Srivastava, Ashish Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ajay Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided by authority concerned expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order along with fresh representation is produced before the said authority. 7. With aforesaid observations and directions, the petition is finally disposed of. September 1, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 9874 of 2025 2 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench