HARSH MAURYA MINOR THRU. HIS FATHER AKHILESH KUMAR AND 6 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/8362/2025 · 2025-09-18
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160949 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160949 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8362 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit, filed by learned counsel for the petitioners, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent(s) as well as Ms. Kamini Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Nishant Shukla, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.2, 3 and 5 and perused the material available on record. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners, challenging an order dated 01.08.2025 passed in respect of, seven petitioners in separately whereby, they were terminated from the school in question. In the light of, the rights of the petitioners to pursue education, instructions were called, in the said instructions, it was stated that on account of the acts of indiscipline by the petitioners, action has been taken, subsequently on the intervention of the Court, to find a way out, order has been passed placing the seven students in different colleges of the Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti in the respected classes from which they were expelled. 4. The petitioners have no objection to be permitted to continue with the new colleges where they have been sent in terms of the order dated 12.09.2025, which has been handed over across the bar and is taken on record. In addition thereto, it has been stated that an affidavit has been called from the parents of the students, proforma of the said affidavit is also taken on record Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nishant Shukla Harsh Maurya Minor Thru. His Father Akhilesh Kumar And 6 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s)
and a copy thereon is handed over to the counsel for the petitioners. Counsel for the petitioners states that they have no objection to filing of the said affidavit. 5. In view thereof, the present petition stands disposed of holding that subject to, the petitioners producing the affidavits signed by the parents before the principal of the school where they have been transferred, they have been permitted to undergo studies in accordance with the benefits that are doing in favour of all the similarly placed students. 6.
The requisite forms of the students of Class XII in question shall be ensured to be filled by the principal of the colleges where they have been transferred within the time fixed i.e. by 22.09.2025. September 18, 2025 Praveen WRIC No. 8362 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAVEEN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench