Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160929 (ALL)

SATYA RAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 8 OTHERS

WPIL/894/2025 · 2025-08-29

Pankaj Bhatia

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 894 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer : "issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus thereby commanding the opposite party No. 2 to 4 to remove the illegal encroachment from the public utility land (Naveen Parti, Rasta and Banjar land) bearing Gata No. 182/0.024 hectare and 183/0.0393 hectare, situated at Village-Lalpur, Tehsil and District-Gonda." 3. Learned Standing Counsel, on the basis of the instructions, states that the proceedings under section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code have already been initiated. 4. In view of the said statement, it is directed that the pending proceedings shall be concluded expeditiously in accordance with law. 5. The writ petition stands disposed off with the said observations. August 29, 2025 VNP/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mulayam Singh Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Satya Ram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench