Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16092 (KAR)

NARAYANAMMA v. SMT. JAYAMMA

MFA/943/2025 · 2025-03-04

Hanchate Sanjeevkumar

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:9121 MFA No. 943 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 943 OF 2025 (CPC) BETWEEN: NARAYANAMMA SINCE DECEASED BY HER LRS., 1. SRI. MUNIRAJU S/O. LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, ITTGALPURAA VILLAGE, RAJANKUNTE POST, HESSARGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. 2. SMT. AKKAYAMMA, W/O. CHANDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, CHOKKANAHALLI VILLAGE, ARAKERE POST, HESARGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK. 3. SRI. P. ANJINAPPA, S/O. LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.18, ITTGALPURAA VILLAGE, RAJANKUNTE POST, HESSARGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. V. VISWANATHA SETTY, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by NANDINI B G Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:9121 MFA No. 943 of 2025 AND: 1. SMT. JAYAMMA W/O. LATE PATTALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 2. SRI. MUNIKEMPAIAH, S/O. LATE DODDAMASTAPPA, AGED ABOUT 85 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/AT ITTGALPURAA VILLAGE, RAJANKUNTE POST, HESSARGHATTA HOBLI, YELAHANKA TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 064. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL) TALUK, YELAHANKA, BENGALURU - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. SREENIVASA, ADVOCATE/CR/R1) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(R) OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 24.01.2025 PASSED ON I.A. NO. 2 IN O.S.NO. 292/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU, REJECTING I.A. NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULE 1 AND 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS MFA, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:9121 MFA No. 943 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal. Memo is placed on record. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application impleading purchaser of the suit schedule property. Sd/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE BH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 31