AJEET SINGH YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/8025/2025 · 2025-09-19
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, S Q H Rizvi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160918 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 160918 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8025 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE RAJESH SINGH CHAUHAN, J.
HON'BLE SYED QAMAR HASAN RIZVI, J.
1. Though the name of Shri Gaurav Mani, has been printed in the cause list as counsel for respondent no.4 but he is not present.
2. Heard Shri Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for petitioners, Shri Madhukar Ojha, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
3. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioners have assailed the impugned FIR dated 03.12.2024 bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 828 of 2024, under Sections 409, 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC, Police Station Dewa District Barabanki.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioners has requested that the petitioners may be given liberty to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court and directions may be issued to decide the same with expedition.
5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue and considering the request of learned counsel for petitioners, we dispose of this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioners to file anticipatory bail application before the competent court within a period of two weeks from today and it is also provided that if such an application is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar Mishra, Ajay Kumar Verma, Piyush Tripathi, Shubham Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Gaurav Mani Ajeet Singh Yadav And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
filed before the competent court, the same shall be heard and disposed of with expedition, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to any of the parties, strictly in accordance with law.
6. The petition is disposed of in view of the aforesaid terms. September 19, 2025 Virendra CRLP No. 8025 of 2025 2 (Syed Qamar Hasan Rizvi,J.) (Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench