Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160911 (ALL)

VIMALA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. SECNDARY EDUCATION LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/9795/2025 · 2025-08-29

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 9795 of 2025 Court No. - 4 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 to 4. No notice need be issued to the respondent no. 4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.4 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.4 then the respondent No.4 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of eight weeks from the date of receipt Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manjeet Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Vimala Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secndary Education Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. August 29, 2025 Pachhere/- WRIA No. 9795 of 2025 2 (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench