Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160887 (ALL)

ANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/8031/2025 · 2025-09-01

Rajeev Singh, Rajnish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 8031 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Chandan Srivastava, Advocate of himself and Shri Rajneesh Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of respondent no. 4 is taken on record. Heard Shri Jay Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no. 4. This petition has been filed with the following prayer:- "A. a writ, an order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned FIR No. 0087/2025 U/s- 115(2), 351(3), 324(2), 109(1) B.N.S. & 3(2) V SC/ST Act, dated 10.07.2025, P.S.- Haiderganj, District- Ayodhya in respect of the petitioners, contained as (Annexure No.01) to this writ petition." B. a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to harass and arrest the petitioners in view of impugned FIR No. 0087/2025 U/s- 115(2), 351(3), 324(2), 109(1) B.N.S. & 3(2) V SC/ST Act, dated 10.07.2025, P.S.- Haiderganj, District- Ayodhya." Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have wrongly and falsely been implicated in the impugned F.I.R., whereas they are innocent. Learned AGA for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Jay Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Anjay Kumar And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) opposed the submission(s) of learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that serious injuries have been caused including the injury on the head, therefore, the impugned F.I.R. has rightly been lodged. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the F.I.R. as well as medical report, in which serious injuries have been found, the commissioning of offence is made out. No case for interference is made out. Dismissed accordingly. September 1, 2025 Raj CRLP No. 8031 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench