HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5130 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard Sri Pankaj Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India prayer has been made for direction to respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 1616 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. R20241666001616) - Smt. Kushamlata Vs. Amit and Others, under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Board of Revenue, U.P. Lucknow, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the Court concerned and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of Revision No. 1616 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. R20241666001616) - Smt. Kushamlata Vs. Amit and Others, under Section 219 of the U.P. Land Revenue Act, 1901, along with the order passed by this Court, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the Court/Authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case, any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, and proceed in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. August 29, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Verma, Kuldeep Kumar Srivastava, Mangal Sen Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Kushumlata Thru. Power Of Attorney Kislay Mayur .....Petitioner(s) Board Of Revenue Thru. Chairman, Lucknow And 15 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench