Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16087 (CHH)

SHRI SAI PHARMACY COLLEGE v. UNION OF INDIA

WPC/2243/2021 · 2025-04-28

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:19178 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2243 of 2021 1 - Shri Sai Pharmacy College Deurjhal Nandini, Durg , Through Its Chairman Smt. Sarita Vishwakarma W/o Pravin Kumar Vishwakarma , Aged About 50 Years, Residence Of Ward No. 3c, Street 75 Sector 6, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh 2 - G.P. Gupta Pharmacy College Rahod Janjgir Champa , Through Its Secretary Santosh Kumar Gupta Son Of Dr. Geeta Prasad Gupta , Aged About 51 Years, Residence Of Ward No. 2 Main Road Nagar Panchayat Rahod, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhatitsgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh 3 - Sonkar Pharmacy College Raipur Road, Mungeli, Through Its Secretary Shiv Aashish Sonkar , S/o Santulal Sonkar, Aged About 32 Years, Residence Of Sonkar Plaza , Gandhi Ward Mungeli , District Mungeli Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chhattisgarh Pharmacy College Dhanora , Durg Through Its Secretary Nalin Kumar Lunia, S/o D.C. Lunia , Aged About 49 Years, R/o Dhanora, District Durg , Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare Department , Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi. 2 - Pharmacy Council Of India Through Its Registrar Cum Secretary Nbcc Centre , 3rd Floor Plot No. 2, Community Centre, Maa Anandamai Marg Okhla Phase I, Lanmark (Near Hotel Crowne Plaza) New Delhi. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. C. Jayant K. Rao, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. S.G. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.04.28 17:40:36 +0530 2 28-04-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that by efflux of time, instant petition has become infructuous. 2) Considering the submission made hereinabove, instant writ petition stands dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya