Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160852 (ALL)

RAJENDRA KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

A483/696/2025 · 2025-09-08

Ajay Bhanot

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 696 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. Heard Sri Sushil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is the first informant. The trial is pending for the last 13 years. The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the trial of S.T. No. 368/2012: State of U.P. Vs. Baijnath Yadav and another, arising out of Case Crime No. 316/2012, under Sections 302, 307, 323, 325, 504, 506 and 34 I.P.C., Police Station Sangrampur, District Amethi, pending before the learned District and Session Judge, Sultanpur, may be decided within a reasonable period of time. Learned A.G.A. has no objection on the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant. The criminal trial has been pending for the past 13 years and is liable to be expedited. In this wake, the trial court concerned is directed to expedite the trial proceedings in accordance with law Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sushil Kumar Yadav, Durgesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajendra Kumar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) and conclude the same expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year as per law. With the aforesaid observation, this application is disposed of finally. September 8, 2025 Arvind A483 No. 696 of 2025 2 (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench