Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160836 (ALL)

RAM DHIRAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. REVENUE DEPTT., LKO. AND OTHERS

A227/5128/2025 · 2025-09-02

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5128 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent No.s 1 and 2 while notice on behalf of respondent No.4- Gaon Sabha has been accepted by Sri Pankaj Gupta. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondent is dispensed herewith. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to respondent No.2- Additional District Magistrate, District Gonda to decide case under section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code, computerized case No.D- 202208300001903, (Ashok Kumar Dixti Vs. Ram Dhiraj and others) pending since 18.8.2022, expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no.2 considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent no.2 - Additional District Magistrate, District Gonda is desired to make all endeavor to decide case under section 128 of U.P. Revenue Code, computerized case No.D-202208300001903, (Ashok Kumar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arvind Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta Ram Dhiraj .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Revenue Deptt., Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Dixti Vs. Ram Dhiraj and others) pending since 18.8.2022, expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, after affording opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. Counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case, failing which the benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. September 2, 2025 RKM. A227 No. 5128 of 2025 2 (Alok Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench