HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1125 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Sumit Kumar Srivastava, the learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Satyendra Srivastava, the learned Additional Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed by the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. bearing Case Crime No.80 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 87, 351(3) B.N.S., registered at Police Station Sangramgarh, District Pratapgarh. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 12.05.2025 stating that the applicant had enticed away the informant's daughter aged about 14 years. 4. In the statement of the alleged victim recorded under Section 183 BNSS she stated that her mother had beaten her up and, therefore, she had gone away with the applicant and she used to talk to him since before. She stated that the applicant was not agreeing to take her with him but still she had gone with him. 5. In the affidavit filed in support of the anticipatory bail-application it has been contended that the applicant is a young man aged 25 years, he is innocent, he has no previous criminal history and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. 6. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail and he has submitted that the investigation of the case is still going on. 7. Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS coupled Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sumit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Kumar Saroj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) with the fact that the applicant is a young man having no previous criminal history and without making any observations which may affect the outcome of the case, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for granting anticipatory bail to the applicant. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicant is allowed. In the event of arrest/ appearance of applicant-Amit Kumar Saroj before the learned Trial Court in the aforesaid case crime, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his furnishing personal bond and two solvent sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of S.H.O./Court concerned on the following conditions and subject to any other conditions that may be fixed by the Trial Court: (i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; (iii) that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court' (iv) that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted; and (v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness. August 29, 2025 Ram. NABAIL No. 1125 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench