Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 16080 (BOM)

NATHU BHAUDU ZOPE AND ORS v. THE COLLECTOR, JALGAON

CA/4544/2025 · 2025-04-23

Shri N B Suryawanshi, Smt Manjusha Ajay Deshpande

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ca4425-25.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4425 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1412 OF 2021 Giridhar Dattatraya Patil and Others APPLICANTS VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Ms. Sakshi Kale h/f Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. D. Ghayal, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Respondents No.3 and 4 ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. J.] DATE : 23 rd APRIL, 2025 ORDER : 1. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the application and in view of no serious objection on the part of Respondents – original Appellants, the Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause “B”. [ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca4425-25.doc 2025:BHC-AUG:11730 ca4425-25.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4544 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO.1359 OF 2021 Nathu Bhaudu Zope and Others APPLICANTS VERSUS The Collector Jalgaon and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Ms. Sakshi Kale h/f Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for the Applicants Mr. S. D. Ghayal, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Respondents No.3 and 4 ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. J.] DATE : 23 rd APRIL, 2025 ORDER : 1. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “C”, “D” and “D-1”. 3. Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. [ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca4425-25.doc ca4425-25.doc drp IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4540 OF 2025 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1406 OF 2021 Govinda Nathu Manore and Others APPLICANTS VERSUS The Executing Engineer, Girna Cannal Renovation Division No.2, Jalgaon and Others RESPONDENTS ....... Ms. Sakshi Kale h/f Mr. A. B. Kale, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. D. Ghayal, AGP for Respondent - State Mr. Ajay D. Pawar, Advocate for Respondent No.1 ....… [CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, & MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. J.] DATE : 23 rd APRIL, 2025 ORDER : 1. Heard. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses “B”, “C” and “C-1”. [ MANJUSHA DESHPANDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ] JUDGE JUDGE drp/ca4425-25.doc