APHC010210332025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 19068/2025 Between: 1. G VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, S/O. VENKATA REDDY, AGE. 55 YEARS, OCC. PVT WORKS, R/O. H.NO. 10-104-52 G2, SAI NAGAR, JAWAHERNAGAR COLONY, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-523316. CELL. 9440450162. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ELECTRICITY AND ENERGY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 2. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUT SOUDHA, GUNADALA, VIJAYAWADA, N T R DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. ANDHRA PRADESH CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, APCPDCL, DR. YSR VIDYUTH SOUDHA, CORPORATE OFFICE, BESIDE GOVT POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE, ITI ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH -520008. 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, APCPDCL (OPERATIONS), BHAGYANAGAR, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P. - 523001. 5. SRI Y NAGENDRA, ADDITIONAL ASSISTANT ENGINEER, PRESENT WORKING AT DOMALA (SECTION), MARKAPUR DIVISION, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.3 and 4 in not consideration of complaint/representation of petitioner dated 12-08-2024 and non initiation of departmental enquiry against Respondent No.5 are illegal, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 16, and 300A of Constitution of India and consecutively direct the respondent No. 3 and 4 to conduct departmental enquiry against fraudulent appointment of Respondent No.5 by using his created and false documents, by allowing the evidence of petitioner and, to take action as per law in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to condone the delay of 79 days in resubmitting the returned W.P.No.19068 of 2025 and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondent No.3 & 4 not to release and pay salary to Respondent No.5 pending disposal of this Writ Petition in the circumstances of the case and interest ofjustice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISTIPATI PAPI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY W.P.No.19068 of 2025 ORDER: This petition is filed declaring the action of Respondent Nos.3 and 4 in not consideration of complaint/representation of Petitioner dated 12.08.2024 and non-initiation of departmental enquiry against Respondent No.5 as illegal and arbitrary. 2. Sri Kristipati Papi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appearing through virtual mode seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition and pursue by way of a Public Interest Litigation. 3. Permission is accorded and the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY,J Date: 25.07.2025 SCS 4 71 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 19068/2025 DATE:- 25.07.2025 SCS