Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 160761 (ALL)

SMT. SUDHA v. SUB-DIVIONAL MAGISTRATE TILOI DISTT. - AMETHI AND 5 OTHERS

WRIC/8370/2025 · 2025-09-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 8370 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the recovery certificate issued by the respondent-Bank in respect of the three loans. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to approach the respondent-Bank for a one time settlement of the dues. 4. Without going into the merits of the claim of the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to move an application for one time settlement, if so advised, in accordance with law. September 9, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Zahir Ahmad Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nitin Srivastava (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Smt. Sudha .....Petitioner(s) Sub-Divional Magistrate Tiloi Distt. - Amethi And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench